Loading...
Exploring the Use of Option Gridâ„¢ Patient Decision Aids in a Sample of Clinics in Poland
Scalia, Peter Elwyn, Glyn Barr, Paul Song, Julia Lesniak, Monika Mullin, Sarah Kurek, Kryzysztof Bushell, Matt Durand, Marie-Anne
Scalia, Peter
Elwyn, Glyn
Barr, Paul
Song, Julia
Lesniak, Monika
Mullin, Sarah
Kurek, Kryzysztof
Bushell, Matt
Durand, Marie-Anne
Citations
Altmetric:
Genre
Journal article
Date
2018-05-29
Advisor
Committee member
Group
Department
Social and Behavioral Sciences
Permanent link to this record
Collections
Research Projects
Organizational Units
Journal Issue
DOI
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.zefq.2018.04.002
Abstract
Background: Research on the implementation of patient decision aids to facilitate shared decision making in clinical settings has steadily increased across Western countries. A study which implements decision aids and measures their impact on shared decision making has yet to be conducted in the Eastern part of Europe. Objective: To study the use of Option GridTM patient decision aids in a sample of Grupa LUX MED clinics in Warsaw, Poland, and measure their impact on shared decision making. Method: We conducted a pre-post interventional study. Following a three-month period of usual care, clinicians from three Grupa LUX MED clinics received a one-hour training session on how to use three Option GridTM decision aids and were provided with copies for use for four months. Throughout the study, all eligible patients were asked to complete the three-item CollaboRATE patient-reported measure of shared decision making after their clinical encounter. CollaboRATE enables patients to assess the efforts clinicians make to: (i) inform them about their health issues; (ii) listen to ‘what matters most’; (iii) integrate their treatment preference in future plans. A hierarchical logistic regression model was performed to understand which variables had an effect on CollaboRATE. Results: 2,048 patients participated in the baseline phase; 1,889 patients participated in the intervention phase. Five of the thirteen study clinicians had a statistically significant increase in their CollaboRATE scores (p < .05) when comparing baseline phase to intervention phase. All five clinicians were located at the same clinic, the only clinic where an overall increase (non-significant) in the mean CollaboRATE top score percentage occurred from baseline phase (M = 60 %, SD = 0.49; 95 % CI [57-63 %]) to intervention phase (M = 62 %, SD = 0.49; 95% CI [59-65%]). Only three of those five clinicians who had a statistically significant increase had a clinically significant difference. Conclusion: The implementation of Option GridTM helped some clinicians practice shared decision making as reflected in CollaboRATE scores, but most clinicians did not have a significant increase in their scores. Our study indicates that the effect of these interventions may be dependent on clinic contexts and clinician engagement.
Description
Citation
Scalia, P., Elwyn, G., Barr, P., Song, J., Zisman-Ilani, Y., Lesniak, M., Mullin, S., Kurek, K., Bushell, M., & Durand, M.-A. (2018). Exploring the Use of Option Gridâ„¢ Patient Decision Aids in a Sample of Clinics in Poland. The Journal of Evidence and Quality in Health Care, 134, 1-8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.zefq.2018.04.002
Citation to related work
Elsevier
Has part
The Journal of Evidence and Quality in Health Care, Vol. 134
ADA compliance
For Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) accommodation, including help with reading this content, please contact scholarshare@temple.edu