Thumbnail Image
Item

Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization: Gender Stereotypes and Assumptions in the Language of the Supreme Court.

Kubicka, Shelby Kalina
Citations
Altmetric:
Genre
Research project
Date
2024
Advisor
Pollitt, Jennifer
Committee member
Group
Department
Subject
United States. Supreme Court
 Abortion--Law and legislation--United States
 Stereotypes (Social psychology)
Permanent link to this record
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12613/10152
Collections
Livingstone Undergraduate Research Awards
Show all metadata
Files
Thumbnail Image
Kubicka-ResearchProject-2024.pdf
Adobe PDF, 239.07 KB
Research Projects
Organizational Units
Journal Issue
DOI
http://dx.doi.org/10.34944/dspace/10114
Abstract
Through a textual analysis of Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization, this project seeks to better understand and compare the language used by the Supreme Court in the majority and dissenting opinions through a lens of gender and sexuality. To better understand the biases that influence the Supreme Court, this study was conducted through a textual analysis of both the majority and dissenting opinions in Dobbs. The analysis identifies differences in the language used in the majority and dissenting opinions.
Description
Citation
Citation to related work
Has part
ADA compliance
For Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) accommodation, including help with reading this content, please contact scholarshare@temple.edu
Embedded videos