Loading...
Systematic review of quantitative imaging biomarkers for neck and shoulder musculoskeletal disorders
Gold, Judith E. ; Hallman, David M. ; Hellstrom, Fredrik ; Bjorklund, Martin ; Crenshaw, Albert G. ; Mathiassen, Svend Erik ; ; Ali, Sayed
Gold, Judith E.
Hallman, David M.
Hellstrom, Fredrik
Bjorklund, Martin
Crenshaw, Albert G.
Mathiassen, Svend Erik
Ali, Sayed
Citations
Altmetric:
Genre
Journal article
Date
2017-09-12
Advisor
Committee member
Group
Department
Radiology
Anatomy and Cell Biology
Anatomy and Cell Biology
Subject
Permanent link to this record
Collections
Research Projects
Organizational Units
Journal Issue
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-017-1694-y
Abstract
Background: This study systematically summarizes quantitative imaging biomarker research in non-traumatic neck and shoulder musculoskeletal disorders (MSDs). There were two research questions: 1) Are there quantitative imaging biomarkers associated with the presence of neck and shoulder MSDs?, 2) Are there quantitative imaging biomarkers associated with the severity of neck and shoulder MSDs? Methods: PubMed and SCOPUS were used for the literature search. One hundred and twenty-five studies met primary inclusion criteria. Data were extracted from 49 sufficient quality studies. Results: Most of the 125 studies were cross-sectional and utilized convenience samples of patients as both cases and controls. Only half controlled for potential confounders via exclusion or in the analysis. Approximately one-third reported response rates. In sufficient quality articles, 82% demonstrated at least one statistically significant association between the MSD(s) and biomarker(s) studied. The literature synthesis suggested that neck muscle size may be decreased in neck pain, and trapezius myalgia and neck/shoulder pain may be associated with reduced vascularity in the trapezius and reduced trapezius oxygen saturation at rest and in response to upper extremity tasks. Reduced vascularity in the supraspinatus tendon may also be a feature in rotator cuff tears. Five of eight studies showed an association between a quantitative imaging marker and MSD severity.
Conclusions: Although research on quantitative imaging biomarkers is still in a nascent stage, some MSD biomarkers were identified. There are limitations in the articles examined, including possible selection bias and inattention to potentially confounding factors. Recommendations for future studies are provided.
Description
Citation
Gold, J.E., Hallman, D.M., Hellström, F. et al. Systematic review of quantitative imaging biomarkers for neck and shoulder musculoskeletal disorders. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 18, 395 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-017-1694-y
Citation to related work
BMC
Has part
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, Vol. 18
ADA compliance
For Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) accommodation, including help with reading this content, please contact scholarshare@temple.edu