Loading...
Assuring Access to Abortion
Rebouché, Rachel
Rebouché, Rachel
Citations
Altmetric:
Genre
Report
Date
2021
Advisor
Committee member
Department
Subject
Permanent link to this record
Collections
Research Projects
Organizational Units
Journal Issue
DOI
http://dx.doi.org/10.34944/dspace/6215
Abstract
Over the spring of 2020, numerous states announced measures suspending abortions in
response to COVID-19. Banning abortion during the pandemic is counterproductive. Impeding access
to abortion will not help preserve healthcare resources. Moreover, prohibiting access to abortion care
exacerbates the strain on the healthcare system. People who lack access to abortions will travel to
neighboring states, induce their own abortions, or carry pregnancies to term, which will require prenatal
care and assistance in childbirth. Perhaps more importantly, the people hit hardest by suspending
abortion care are those for whom the pandemic already has had devastating effects. Lifting restrictions
on medication abortion and expanding telehealth abortion services will conserve healthcare resources
and improve public health. Recognizing the advantages of telemedicine, some states, as well as the
federal government, have relaxed restrictions on remote diagnosis and treatment. However, many of those
same states have carved out exceptions for abortion in their telemedicine policies. In addition, people
seeking medication abortions still face unnecessary restrictions on access, none of which are applied to
comparable office-based procedures. Policymakers can eliminate barriers to safe abortion services now
and in the future. “No-touch” terminations, in which all medical supervision happens over the telephone
or online, can better accomplish the goals that the present abortion suspensions cannot. Telehealth for
medical abortion can ease the burdens on pregnant people, healthcare workers, and health systems in light
of the unprecedented challenges presented by COVID-19.
Description
Citation
Rachel Rebouché, Assuring Access to Abortion, in Assessing Legal Responses to COVID-19 (Scott Burris et al. eds., 2020).
Citation to related work
Public Health Law Watch
Has part
Burris, S., de Guia, S., Gable, L., Levin, D.E., Parmet, W.E., Terry, N.P. (Eds.) (2020). Assessing Legal Responses to COVID-19. Boston: Public Health Law Watch.
ADA compliance
For Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) accommodation, including help with reading this content, please contact scholarshare@temple.edu