Loading...
Empathy Subjectivity and Testamentary Capacity
Baron, Jane B.
Baron, Jane B.
Citations
Altmetric:
Genre
Journal article
Date
1987
Advisor
Committee member
Group
Department
Permanent link to this record
Collections
Research Projects
Organizational Units
Journal Issue
DOI
http://dx.doi.org/10.34944/dspace/6704
Abstract
This Article examines the requirements of testamentary capacity in the execution of wills, and the difficulties that courts face in determining a testator's intent. The author begins by describing the doctrine of testamentary capacity and explores its connection to the ideas of individualism. The author then examines the tests that courts have adopted for assessing testamentary capacity and argues that these tests have the potential to conflict with the idea that values are subjective. The author proceeds to illustrate how courts typically empathize with the testator, rather than focus on the testator's abstract ability to reason, and explores the relationship between the use of empathy and the premise of wills law. The author concludes that other doctrines of wills law depend more heavily on empathy than previously assumed and that the critical inquiry of a testator's intent can never be confidently resolved.
Description
Citation
Jane B. Baron, Empathy Subjectivity and Testamentary Capacity, 24 San Diego L. Rev. 1043 (1987).
Available at: https://digital.sandiego.edu/sdlr/vol24/iss5/2
Available at: https://digital.sandiego.edu/sdlr/vol24/iss5/2
Citation to related work
San Diego Law Review Association
Has part
San Diego Law Review, Vol. 24, Iss. 5 (1987)
ADA compliance
For Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) accommodation, including help with reading this content, please contact scholarshare@temple.edu