Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Item

From Thinking to Doing: Effects of Different Social Norms on Ethical Behavior in Journalism

Lee, Angela M.
Coleman, Renita
Citations
Altmetric:
Genre
Post-print
Date
2016-05-02
Advisor
Committee member
Group
Department
Journalism
Subject
Permanent link to this record
Research Projects
Organizational Units
Journal Issue
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/23736992.2016.1152898
Abstract
Journalists have been shown to be highly capable of making good moral decisions, but they do not always act as ethically as studies show them to be able. Using the Reasoned Action Model, this study explores the gap between moral motivation and moral behavior and tests the proposition that different social norms can help predict how journalists behave across three ethical and three unethical behaviors (N=374). The study found that descriptive norms predicted ethical behaviors and that injunctive norms predicted unethical behaviors. Descriptive norms also accounted for more variance in journalists’ ethical behavior (48%) than injunctive norms did on unethical behavior (28%). The findings advance the Four-Component Model in significantly improving moral behavior predictability and offer a new way to assess journalists’ moral reasoning.
Description
Citation
Lee, A. M., Coleman, R., & Molyneux, L. (2016). From Thinking to Doing: Effects of Different Social Norms on Ethical Behavior in Journalism. Journal of Media Ethics, 31(2), 72–85. https://doi.org/10.1080/23736992.2016.1152898
Citation to related work
Taylor and Francis Group
This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in Journal of Media Ethics on 2016-04-02, available online: https://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/23736992.2016.1152898 .
Has part
Journal of Media Ethics, Vol. 31, Iss. 2
ADA compliance
For Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) accommodation, including help with reading this content, please contact scholarshare@temple.edu
Embedded videos