Item

3D Data Creation to Curation: Community Standards for 3D Data Preservation, Chapter 4: Metadata Requirements for 3D Data, Appendix: Survey 1 Results and Survey 2 Results

; 
Blundell, Jon
; 
DeVet, Katherine E.
; 
Hardesty, Juliet L.
Citations
Altmetric:
Genre
Dataset
Date
2022-03
Advisor
Committee member
Group
Department
Scholar's Studio
Subject
Permanent link to this record
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12613/7489
Collections
Research Data
Show all metadata
Files
Results from Survey 1 showing metadata fields used by different institutions for 3D digital objects. See data-specific section for more information. Results from Survey 2 responses to Google form asking about metadata fields used in different activities of the Digital Asset Lifecycle.
Unknown, 412.48 KB
Readme
Text, 7.41 KB
Research Projects
Organizational Units
Journal Issue
DOI
https://dx.doi.org/10.34944/dspace/7467
Abstract
The “Metadata Requirements for 3D Data” chapter provides recommendations for metadata based on the five-stage digital asset lifecycle. The “Create” section covers some of the principal ways 3D models are created and discusses what metadata can be captured during the creation process. This section looks at not only what metadata could be captured during model creation, but also why capturing that information is important. The “Manage” section covers the metadata needs for organizing, verifying, and providing access to 3D data. Recommendations include grouping files together as much as possible (by 3D object, by collection of objects, and by project) in order to apply organizational metadata that can be used for access and reuse purposes. The Distribution and Publication section discusses the need for a variety of distribution platforms that support the broadly varying metadata needs of different disciplines. Examples include the need for more granular metadata to support reproducibility and privacy in certain fields, as well as concerns around metadata requirements for accessibility for disability more broadly. Though the circulation and access norms for 3D data are still evolving, the Access and Reuse section posits key metadata anticipated to be useful in the discovery and access of 3D data and models for research or reuse. The “Archive” section utilizes PREMIS as a basis for its recommendations. The rapid changes in the tools and platforms that support the creation and utilization of 3D data results in heavier emphasis on metadata that provides context to data that is often no longer supported by the latest technologies. Additional portions of PREMIS that may be of interest to readers are also specified. The chapter ends with an overall table of recommended metadata fields along with future work needed, naming annotation metadata and metadata for accessibility needs as top priorities for standardization and best practice recommendations.
Description
Data on metadata practices from different institutions managing 3D data. Consists of results from Surveys 1 and 2 distributed by the metadata working group of the Community Standards for 3D Preservation (CS3DP) project. Dataset consists of a spreadsheet of data shared from institutions and organizations and a PDF summary from Google form. CS3DP project received funding from the Institute of Museum and Library Services.
Citation
Moore, Jennifer, Adam Rountrey, and Hannah Scates Kettler. 2022. “Appendix: Survey 1 Results and Survey 2 Results.” In Chapter 4: Metadata Requirements for 3D Data. 3D Data Creation to Curation: Community Standards for 3D Data Preservation. Association of College & Research Libraries.
Citation to related work
Blundell, Jon, Clark, Jasmine L., DeVet, Katherine E., and Hardesty, Juliet L. 2020. Metadata Requirements for 3D Data. Manuscript submitted for publication. https://dx.doi.org/10.34944/dspace/6733.
Has part
ADA compliance
For Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) accommodation, including help with reading this content, please contact scholarshare@temple.edu
Embedded videos