Loading...
Asymmetry In Operational Efficiency and Managerial Ability Benchmarks
TRIPATHI, MUKTAK KRISHNACHANDRA
TRIPATHI, MUKTAK KRISHNACHANDRA
Citations
Altmetric:
Genre
Thesis/Dissertation
Date
2023-08
Advisor
Committee member
Group
Department
Business Administration/Accounting
Permanent link to this record
Collections
Research Projects
Organizational Units
Journal Issue
DOI
http://dx.doi.org/10.34944/dspace/8939
Abstract
Standard empirical models of operating efficiency (OE) and managerial ability (MA) assume a symmetric linear relation of OE and MA with firm performance. However, OE and MA metrics are likely to respond faster to a demand decrease than a demand increase due to cost stickiness and respond faster to negative returns than to positive returns due to accounting conservatism. As predicted, I find large asymmetries in the behavior of OE and MA measures. OE and MA in levels (changes) are 2.4 (1.4) times and 1.5 (1.6) times more sensitive to demand decreases than demand increases. Similarly, OE and MA levels (changes) are 1.7 (1.5) times and 3.6 (2.3) times more sensitive to negative returns than to positive returns. The incremental explanatory power of modeling asymmetry in OE and MA levels (changes) is 20.9% (39.5%) and 263.3% (27.6%), measured as incremental adjusted R2. Cross-sectionally, asymmetry in OE and MA varies with the determinants of cost stickiness: (1) asset intensity and (2) employee intensity. Moreover, the degree of asymmetry also varies with the determinants of accounting conservatism: (1) book-to-market value of equity, (2) leverage, and (3) market capitalization. In addition, demand decline (i.e., cost stickiness) and bad news (i.e., accounting conservatism) during prior and successive periods have an incremental impact on the asymmetry in OE and MA. The standard models of OE and MA do not control for these correlated-omitted variables or incorporate the cost stickiness and accounting conservatism asymmetries, which yield biased measurements and render incorrect regression estimates and inferences.
Description
Citation
Citation to related work
Has part
ADA compliance
For Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) accommodation, including help with reading this content, please contact scholarshare@temple.edu