This Dupuytren’sDisease_SRsearch_readme.txt file was generated on 20250114 by Sarah Bauman ------------------- GENERAL INFORMATION ------------------- 1. Title of Dataset: Search Strategies for Comparative Analysis of The Recurrence Rates in Dupuytren's Contracture: Percutaneous Vs. Surgical Management: a systematic review 2. Author Information: Principal Investigator Contact Information Name: Sameer Patel, MD, FACS Institution: Fox Chase Cancer Center Address: Email: sameer.patel0001@temple.edu ORCID: Associate or Co-investigator Contact Information Name: Alexander Chang, BA, MSc Institution: Lewis Katz School of Medicine Address: Email: Alexander.Chang@temple.edu ORCID: Associate or Co-investigator Contact Information Name: Funiba Ngwa, BA Institution: Lewis Katz School of Medicine Address: Email: funiba.ngwa@temple.edu ORCID: Librarian Co-Author Contact Information Name: Sarah Bauman, AHIP, MSLIS, MALS Institution: Krausz Library of Podiatric Medicine Address:148 N. 8th Street, 6th floor Email: sarah.bauman@temple.edu ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0008-6472-2500 3. Date of data collection (single date, range, approximate date): 20240114 4. Geographic location of data collection: Krausz Library of Podiatric Medicine, Temple University, 148 N. 8th Street, 6th Floor, Philadelphia, PA 19107 5. Information about funding sources or sponsorship that supported the collection of the data: N/A -------------------------- SHARING/ACCESS INFORMATION -------------------------- 1. Licenses/restrictions placed on the data, or limitations of reuse: Creative Commons CC-BY-NC-SA License 2. Recommended citation for the data: Bauman, S., Chang, A., Patel, S., et al. Search Strategies for Comparative Analysis of The Recurrence Rates in Dupuytren's Contracture: Percutaneous Vs. Surgical Management: a systematic review. November 26, 2024. Temple University Libraries, Evidence Synthesis and Systematic Review Service. 3. Citation for and links to publications that cite or use the data: Not available yet 4. Links to other publicly accessible locations of the data: N/A 5. Links/relationships to ancillary or related data sets: N/A 6. Was data derived from another source? No If yes, list source(s): -------------------- DATA & FILE OVERVIEW -------------------- 1. File list (filenames, directory structure (for zipped files) and brief description of all data files, add additional entries as necessary): A. Filename: 20250114_SR_Dupuytren_FinalSearchResults.xlsx Short description: Search strategy details only-Contains PRISMA flow diagram counts, search strategies completed on 20250114 B. Filename: 20250114_Dupuytren_Results.csv Short description: Cover sheet of search detail contains data for PRISMA flow diagram or chart [http://prisma-statement.org/prismastatement/flowdiagram.aspx] C. Filename: 20250114_SR_Dupuytren_Strateg.csv Short description: Search Strategies for review including sources: PubMed (NLM), Embase (Elsevier), Cochrane (Central), Web of Science Core Collection (Clarivate Analytics), ScienceDirect (Elsevier), CINAHL(Ebscohost), ClinicalTrials.Gov ( www.clinicaltrials.gov), and TRIP medical database (tripdatabase.com) D. Filename:For_Rayyan_Chang_217Rev.txt Short description: deduplicated citation file, is compatible with Rayyan or other citation managers, contains 3,284 citations 2. Relationship between files, if important for context: For_Rayyan_Chang_217Rev.txt contains all of the citations to deposit into Rayyan or other systematic review screening tools such as Covidence or Abstrackr. Files B and C are contained as tabs in file A and are provided as separate csv files. 3. Additional related data collected that was not included in the current data package: N/A 4. Are there multiple versions of the dataset? No If yes, list versions: Name of file that was updated: i. Why was the file updated? ii. When was the file updated? Name of file that was updated: i. Why was the file updated? ii. When was the file updated? -------------------------- METHODOLOGICAL INFORMATION -------------------------- 1. Description of methods used for collection/generation of data: To identify studies to include or consider for this scoping review, the review team worked with a librarian (SB) to develop detailed search strategies for each database. The PRISMA-S extension was followed for search reporting. The librarian (SB) developed the search for PubMed (NLM) and translated the search for every database searched. The PubMed (NLM) search strategy was reviewed by the research team to check for accuracy and term relevancy. All final searches were peer-reviewed by another librarian, Jacob Brintzenhoff, MLIS, following the Peer Review of Electronic Search Strategies (PRESS checklist). The databases included in this search are [list of databases: PubMed (NLM), Embase (Elsevier), Web of Science Core Collection (Clarivate Analytics), Science Direct (Elsevier), CINAHL (Ebscohost), and Cochrane (Wiley) using a combination of keywords and subject headings. A grey literature search included and Trip Pro Medical Database (https://www.tripdatabase.com) and ClinicalTrials.gov ( www.clinicaltrials.gov). All final searches were performed on January 14, 2025 by the librarian and were fully reported to the research team on January 14, 2025. The full search strategies as reported by the librarian are provided in Appendix(___). They are also archived at [DOI]. A summary of the search results: PubMed (NLM) from 1809 to 01/14/2025 (1,364 Results) Embase (Elsevier) from 1974 to 1/14/2024 (1,575 Results) Cochrane Central (Wiley) from inception to 1/14/2025 (106 Results) Web of Science Core Collection (Clarivate Analytics) from 1900 to 1/14/2025 (263 Results) Science Direct (Elsevier) from inception to 1/14/2025 (827 Results) CINAHL (EbscoHost) from 1976 to 1/14/2025 (142 Results) ClinicalTrials.Gov (via www.clinicaltrials.gov) from inception to 1/14/2025 (50 studies) TRIP Pro from 1867 to 1/14/2025 (335 results) The search resulted in 4,662 results. 1,378 duplicate studies were found and omitted by the librarian [SB] using EndNote 20 and following the following the Wichor Bramer method. This resulted in 3,284 records to screen from databases and websites. Studies were screened by title and abstract by two blinded and independent reviewers. If a tiebreaker was needed, a third reviewer was called in. This process was repeated for full text article screening and article selection. 2. Methods for processing the data: The citations can be deposited into a systematic review software for screening and is formatted for importing into Rayyan [https://rayyan.ai] a free screening tool. The file is also compatible with the Covidence (requires a subscription or free trial) [https://www.covidence.org/] and Abstrackr (free) [http://abstrackr.cebm.brown.edu/] systematic review screening tools. 3. Describe any quality-assurance procedures performed on the data: N/A 4. People involved with sample collection, processing, analysis and/or submission: Sarah Bauman, AHIP, MSLIS, MALS, Temple University Libraries-conducted searches, deduplication of records, compilation of search records and reporting. DATA-SPECIFIC INFORMATION FOR: For_Rayyan_Chang_217Rev.txt 1. Number of databases searched:6 databases ,2 grey literature sources 2. Number of citations: Rayyan file contains 3,284 citations from databases (after deduplication via Endnote 20). 3. Specialized formats or other abbreviations used: File is compatible to import to Rayyan and citation manager tools