This Spirometry and COPD Systematic Review Search_readme.txt file was generated on 20240216 by Travis Nace ------------------- GENERAL INFORMATION ------------------- 1. Title of Dataset: Performing Spirometry and Low Dose Chest CT to Screen for COPD Systematic Review Search Strategy 2. Author Information: Principal Investigator Contact Information Name: Stephen Dachert, MD Institution: Temple University Hospital – Main Campus Address: 3401 N. Broad St, Philadelphia, PA 19140 Email: stephen.dachert2@tuhs.temple.edu ORCID: n/a Associate or Co-investigator Contact Information Name: Michaela Seigo, DO Institution: Temple University Hospital – Main Campus Address: 3401 N. Broad St, Philadelphia, PA 19140 Email: michaela.seigo@tuhs.temple.edu ORCID: n/a Associate or Co-investigator Contact Information Name: Gerard J. Criner, MD Institution: Temple University Hospital – Main Campus Address: 3401 N. Broad St, Philadelphia, PA 19140 Email: gerard.criner@tuhs.temple.edu ORCID: n/a Librarian Co-Author Contact Information Name: Travis Nace, MSLIS Institution: Temple University Address: Ginsburg Library 3400 N. Broad Street, Philadelphia, PA 19140 Email:travis.nace@temple.edu ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1547-72883. Date of data collection (single date, range, approximate date): 20231102 4. Geographic location of data collection (change default if needed): Ginsburg Health Sciences Library, Temple University, 3500 N. Broad St. Philadelphia, PA 19140 5. Information about funding sources or sponsorship that supported the collection of the data: N/A -------------------------- SHARING/ACCESS INFORMATION -------------------------- 1. Licenses/restrictions placed on the data, or limitations of reuse (If they don’t decide on a license, we can place an embargo up until they know): Creative Commons CC-BY-NC-SA License 2. Recommended citation for the data: Nace, T., Dachert, S., Seigo, M., and Criner, G. Search Strategies for a systematic review of Spirometry and COPD. February 25, 2021. Temple University Libraries, Evidence Synthesis and Systematic Review Service. 3. Citation for and links to publications that cite or use the data: Not available yet 4. Links to other publicly accessible locations of the data: N/A 5. Links/relationships to ancillary or related data sets: 6. Was data derived from another source? No If yes, list source(s): -------------------- DATA & FILE OVERVIEW -------------------- 1. File list (filenames, directory structure (for zipped files) and brief description of all data files): A. Filename: Final Search Results_20231121_TN_SPIROMETRYCOPD_FinalSystematicReviewSearchResults.xlsx Short description: Search strategy details only-Contains PRISMA flow diagram counts, search strategies completed on 20231121 B. Filename: 20231121_SPIROMETRYCOPD_Final Search Results.csv Short description: Cover sheet of search detail contains data for PRISMA flow diagram or chart [http://prisma-statement.org/prismastatement/flowdiagram.aspx] C. Filename: 20231121_SPIROMETRYCOPD_Final Search Strategies.csv Short description: Search Strategies for review including sources: PubMed (NLM), EMBASE (Elsevier), COCHRANE Central Registry of Trials (Wiley), CINAHL (Ebscohost), Web of Science (Clarivate Analytics), ClinicalTrials.gov, WHO ICTRP (https://trialsearch.who.int/), and MedRxiv (https://www.medrxiv.org/) D. Filename: For_Rayyan_Dachert.txt Short description: deduplicated citation file, is compatible with Rayyan or other citation managers, contains 2,386 citations 2. Relationship between files, if important for context: For_Rayyan_Dachert.txt (listed under D.) contains all of the citations to deposit into Rayyan or other systematic review screening tools such as Covidence or Abstrackr. Files B and C are contained as tabs in file A and are provided as separate csv files. 3. Additional related data collected that was not included in the current data package: N/A 4. Are there multiple versions of the dataset? yes/no If yes, list versions: No Name of file that was updated: i. Why was the file updated? ii. When was the file updated? Name of file that was updated: i. Why was the file updated? ii. When was the file updated? -------------------------- METHODOLOGICAL INFORMATION -------------------------- 1. Description of methods used for collection/generation of data: To identify studies to include or consider for this systematic review, the review team worked with a librarian (TN) to develop detailed search strategies for each database. The PRISMA-S extension was followed for search reporting. The librarian (TN) developed the search for PubMed (NLM) and translated the search for every database searched. The PubMed (NLM) search strategy was reviewed by the research team to check for accuracy and term relevancy. All final searches were peer-reviewed by another librarian (Jacob Brintzenhoff) following the Peer Review of Electronic Search Strategies (PRESS checklist). The databases included in this search are PubMed (NLM), Embase (Elsevier), Cochrane Central (Wiley), CINAHL (EbscoHost), and Web of Science (Clarivate Analytics), using a combination of keywords and subject headings. A grey literature search included two clinical trials registries, clinicaltrials.gov and WHO ICTRP (https://trialsearch.who.int/), and the pre-print MedRxiv (https://www.medrxiv.org/). The search was limited to English language and to adults. All final searches were performed on November 17, 2023 by the librarian (TN) and were fully reported on November 21, 2023. The full search strategies as reported by the librarian are provided in Appendix(___). They are also archived at [DOI]. A summary of the search results from databases: PubMed (NLM) from inception to 11/17/2023 (650 Results) Embase (Elsevier) from 1974 to 11/17/2023 (1,849 Results) Cochrane Central (Wiley) from inception to 11/17/2023 (161 Results) CINAHL (EbscoHost) from 1982 to 11/17/2023 (36 Results) Web of Science Core Collection (Clarivate Analytics) from inception to 11/17/2023 (416 Results) The search resulted in 3,347 studies and 961 duplicate studies were found and omitted by the librarian the EndNote 20 and following the Wichor Bramer duplicate identification strategy. This resulted in 3,165 records to screen from databases or registers and 182 records to screen from other methods, resulting in a total of 2,386 records. Studies were screened by title and abstract by two blinded and independent reviewers. If a tiebreaker was needed, a third reviewer was called in. This process was repeated for full text article screening and article selection. 2. Standards and calibration information, if appropriate: The citations can be deposited into a systematic review software for screening and is formatted for importing into Rayyan [https://rayyan.qcri.org/] a free screening tool. The file is also compatible with the Covidence (requires a subscription or free trial) [https://www.covidence.org/] and Abstrackr (free) [http://abstrackr.cebm.brown.edu/] systematic review screening tools. 3. Describe any quality-assurance procedures performed on the data: N/A 4. People involved with sample collection, processing, analysis and/or submission: Travis Nace, MSLIS Temple University Libraries-conducted searches, deduplication of records, compilation of search records and reporting. ———————————————————— DATA-SPECIFIC INFORMATION FOR: For_Rayyan_Dachert.txt ———————————————————— 1. Number of databases searched: 5 databases, 3 grey literature sources 2. Number of citations: Rayyan file contains 2,386 citations from databases (after deduped via Endnote 20) 3. Specialized formats or other abbreviations used: File is compatible to import to Rayyan and citation manager tools