This ACES Built Environment Scoping Review Search_20220602_readme.txt file was generated on 20220719 by Stephanie Roth ------------------- GENERAL INFORMATION ------------------- 1. Title of Dataset: ACES and Built Environment Scoping Review Search Strategy 2. Author Information: Principal Investigator Contact Information Name: Yaara Zisman-Ilani, PhD Institution: Temple University, College of Public Health, Social and Behavioral Sciences Address: 1700 N. Broad Street Philadelphia, PA 19140 Email: yaara@temple.edu ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6852-2583 Co-Author Contact Information Name: Mona Baishya Institution: Temple University, College of Public Health, Social and Behavioral Sciences Address: 1700 N. Broad Street Philadelphia, PA 19140 Email: mona.baishya@temple.edu ORCID: n/a Librarian Co-Author Contact Information Name: Stephanie C. Roth, MLIS Institution: ChristianaCare Address: 4755 Ogletown Stanton Rd, Newark, DE 19718 Email: stephanie.roth@christianacare.org ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5415-1718 3. Date of data collection (single date, range, approximate date): 20220603 4. Geographic location of data collection (change default if needed): Ginsburg Health Sciences Library, Temple University, 3500 N. Broad St. Philadelphia, PA 19140 5. Information about funding sources or sponsorship that supported the collection of the data: N/A -------------------------- SHARING/ACCESS INFORMATION -------------------------- 1. Licenses/restrictions placed on the data, or limitations of reuse (If they don’t decide on a license, we can place an embargo up until they know): Creative Commons CC-BY-NC-SA License 2. Recommended citation for the data: Roth, S., Baishya, M., Zisman-Ilani, Y. Search Strategies for a scoping review of healthcare for sex workers. June 2, 2022. Temple University Health Sciences Libraries, Systematic Review Service. 3. Citation for and links to publications that cite or use the data: Not available yet 4. Links to other publicly accessible locations of the data: N/A 5. Links/relationships to ancillary or related data sets: 6. Was data derived from another source? No If yes, list source(s): -------------------- DATA & FILE OVERVIEW -------------------- 1. File list (filenames, directory structure (for zipped files) and brief description of all data files): A. Filename: 20220602_ZY_MLB_SR_FinalScopingReviewSearchResults.xlsx Short description: Search strategy details -Contains PRISMA flow diagram counts, search strategies completed on 20220602 B. Filename: 20220602_ZY_MLB_SR_PeerSupport_Strategy.csv Short description: Search strategies for databases and grey literature C. Filename: 20220602_ZY_MLB_SR_PeerSupport_Results.csv Short description: PRISMA flow diagram counts D. Filename: 20220602_ZY_MLB_SR_databases.txt Short description: deduplicated citation file from databases and registers E. Filename: 20220602_ZY_MLB_SR_For Rayyan_grey lit.txt Short description: deduplicated citation file from other sources (grey literature) 2. Relationship between files, if important for context: Files B and C are contained in File A, csv provided for interoperability. MLB_For Rayyan_databases.txt (listed under D.) contains the database citations to deposit into Rayyan or other systematic review screening tools such as Covidence or Abstrackr. MLB_For Rayyan_grey lit.txt (listed under E.) contains the grey literature citations to deposit into Rayyan or other systematic review screening tools such as Covidence or Abstrackr. 3. Additional related data collected that was not included in the current data package: N/A 4. Are there multiple versions of the dataset? yes/no If yes, list versions: No Name of file that was updated: i. Why was the file updated? ii. When was the file updated? Name of file that was updated: i. Why was the file updated? ii. When was the file updated? -------------------------- METHODOLOGICAL INFORMATION -------------------------- 1. Description of methods used for collection/generation of data: To identify studies to include or consider for this scoping review, the review team worked with a medical librarian (SR) to develop detailed search strategies for each database. The PRISMA-S extension was followed for search reporting. The medical librarian (SR) developed the search for PubMed (NLM) and translated the search for every database searched. The PubMed (NLM) search strategy was reviewed by the research team to check for accuracy and term relevancy, and all final searches were peer-reviewed by another medical librarian following the PRESS checklist. The databases included in this search are PubMed (NLM), Embase (Elsevier), Web of Science (Clarivate Analytics), Cochrane Central (Wiley), PsycInfo (EbscoHost) and CINAHL (EbscoHost) using a combination of keywords and subject headings. A grey literature search included a clinical trials registry (clinicaltrials.gov) and the TRIP Pro medical database (tripdatabase.com) website. There were no limits to the search. All final searches were performed on June 2, 2022 by the librarian and were fully reported (SR). A summary of the search results from databases: PubMed (NLM) from inception to 6/2/2022 (3,635 Results) Embase (Elsevier) from inception to 6/2/2022 (3,085 Results) Web of Science (Clarivate Analytics) from inception to 6/2/2022 (3,578 Results) Cochrane Central (Wiley) from inception to 6/2/2022 (390 Results) PsycInfo (EbscoHost) from inception to 6/2/2022 (4,247 Results) CINAHL (EbscoHost) from inception to 6/2/2022 (4,255 Results) The search resulted in 19,365 studies and 5,702 duplicate studies were found and omitted by the librarian (SR) using the EndNote 20 duplicate identification strategy. This resulted in 13,542 records to screen from databases or registers and 121 records to screen from other methods, resulting in a total of 13,663 records. Studies were screened by title and abstract by two blinded and independent reviewers. If a tiebreaker was needed, a third reviewer was called in. This process was repeated for full text article screening and article selection. 2. Standards and calibration information, if appropriate: The citations can be deposited into a systematic review software for screening and is formatted for importing into Rayyan [https://rayyan.qcri.org/] a free screening tool. The file is also compatible with the Covidence (requires a subscription or free trial) [https://www.covidence.org/] and Abstrackr (free) [http://abstrackr.cebm.brown.edu/] systematic review screening tools. 3. Describe any quality-assurance procedures performed on the data: N/A 4. People involved with sample collection, processing, analysis and/or submission: Stephanie Roth, MLIS Temple University Libraries-conducted searches, deduplication of records, compilation of search records and reporting. ———————————————————— DATA-SPECIFIC INFORMATION FOR: ———————————————————— 1. Number of databases searched: 6 databases 2. Number of citations: Rayyan has 13,489 records from databases (after deduped via Endnote 20), does not include the 174 citations from other grey literature. 3. Specialized formats or other abbreviations used: File is compatible to import to Rayyan and citation manager tools ———————————————————— DATA-SPECIFIC INFORMATION FOR: ———————————————————— 1. Number of grey literature searched: 2 grey literature sources 2. Number of citations: Rayyan file contains 174 citations from grey literature sources (after deduped via Endnote 20). 3. Specialized formats or other abbreviations used: File is compatible to import to Rayyan and citation manager tools