This Parth Rali SR_readme.txt file was generated on 20201111 by Stephanie Roth ------------------- GENERAL INFORMATION ------------------- 1. Title of Dataset: Pulmonary Embolism Response Team (PERT) Systematic Review 2. Author Information: Principal Investigator Contact Information Name: Parth M. Rali, MD Institution:Temple Health Address: Temple Lung Center Temple University Hospital 3401 N. Broad Street Ambulatory Care Center, 5th Floor Philadelphia, PA 19140 Email:Parth.Rali@tuhs.temple.edu ORCID: N/A Associate or Co-investigator Contact Information Name: Shari B. Brosnahan, MD Institution: NYU Langone Health Address: 550 1st Avenue New York, NY 10016 Email: Shari.Brosnahan@nyulangone.org ORCID: N/A Librarian Co-Author Contact Information Name: Stephanie C. Roth, MLIS Institution: Temple University Address: Ginsburg Library 3500 N. Broad Street Philadelphia, PA 19140 Email:stephanie.roth@temple.edu ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5415-1718 3. Date of data collection (single date, range, approximate date): 20201109 4. Geographic location of data collection (change default if needed): Ginsburg Health Sciences Library, Temple University, 3500 N. Broad St. Philadelphia, PA 19140 5. Information about funding sources or sponsorship that supported the collection of the data: N/A -------------------------- SHARING/ACCESS INFORMATION -------------------------- 1. Licenses/restrictions placed on the data, or limitations of reuse (If they don’t decide on a license, we can place an embargo up until they know): CC-BY-NC-SA: Attribution + Noncommercial + Sharealike . 2. Recommended citation for the data: Roth, S., Parth, R., Brosnahan, S., et al. Search Strategies for a Systematic review of PERT based outcomes for patients with Pulmonary Embolism[a][b]. December 15, 2020. Temple University Health Sciences Libraries, Systematic Review Service. http://dx.doi.org/10.34944/dspace/4472 3. Citation for and links to publications that cite or use the data: N/A 4. Links to other publicly accessible locations of the data: 5. Links/relationships to ancillary or related data sets: 6. Was data derived from another source? If yes, list source(s): -------------------- DATA & FILE OVERVIEW -------------------- 1. File list (filenames, directory structure (for zipped files) and brief description of all data files): The search was conducted on 11/9/2020. A. Filename: Parth Rali SR Final Systematic Review Search Results.xlsx Short description: Search strategy details only-Contains PRISMA flow diagram counts, search strategies completed on 20201109 B. Filename: Parth Rali PubMed SR Final Systematic Review Search Results.csv Short description: PubMed search strategy C. Filename: Parth Rali Embase SR Final Systematic Review Search Results.csv Short description: Embase search strategy D. Filename: Parth Rali Web of Science SR Final Systematic Review Search Results.csv Short description: Web of Science search strategy E. Filename: Parth Rali Cinahl SR Final Systematic Review Search Results.csv Short description: Cinahl search strategy F. Filename: Parth Rali MedRxiv SR Final Systematic Review Search Results.csv Short description: MedRxiv search strategy G. Filename: Parth Rali WorldWideScience SR Final Systematic Review Search Results.csv Short description: WorldWideScience search strategy H. Filename: For Rayyan_Parth Rali SR results PERT.txt Short description: deduplicated citation file, is compatible with Rayyan or other citation managers, contains 1,648 citations (doesn’t include 89 citations from MedRxiv) I. Parth Rali SR Final Systematic Review Search Results.csv Short description: Contains PRISMA flow diagram data counts Same content as File A. but in the CSV format 2. Relationship between files, if important for context: All citations are in file H. Filename: For Rayyan_Parth Ralie SR results PERT.txt 3. Additional related data collected that was not included in the current data package: 4. Are there multiple versions of the dataset? yes/no If yes, list versions: No Name of file that was updated: i. Why was the file updated? ii. When was the file updated? Name of file that was updated: i. Why was the file updated? ii. When was the file updated? -------------------------- METHODOLOGICAL INFORMATION -------------------------- 1. Description of methods used for collection/generation of data: [c][d] To identify studies to include or consider for this systematic review, the review team worked with a medical librarian to develop detailed search strategies for each database. The search was developed for PubMed (NLM) and was translated to Embase (Elsevier), Web of Science (Clarivate Analytics) and CINAHL (EbscoHost) using a combination of keywords and subject headings. A grey literature search included World Wide Science and MedRxiv. The search was restricted to human studies and by the year 2009 to Present. The final search was completed on November 9, 2020. The full search details are provided. PubMed (NLM) from 2009 to 11/9/2020 (420 Results) Embase (Elsevier) from 2009 to 11/9/2020 (748 Results) Web of Science (Clarivate Analytics) from 2009 to 11/9/2020 (503 Results) CINAHL (EbscoHost) from 2009 to 11/9/2020 (123 Results) The search resulted in 2,119 studies (325 from grey literature sources). 382 duplicate studies were found and omitted using Endnote X.7 for the deduplication of records and 1,737 references were eligible to screen. Studies were screened by title and abstract by two blinded and independent reviewers. If a tiebreaker was needed, a third reviewer was called in. This process was repeated for full text article screening and selection. 2. Standards and calibration information, if appropriate: 3. Software- or Instrument-specific information needed to interpret the data, including software and hardware version numbers:[e][f] The citations can be deposited into a systematic review software for screening and is formatted for importing into Rayyan [https://rayyan.qcri.org/] a free screening tool. The file is also compatible with the Covidence (requires a subscription or free trial) [https://www.covidence.org/] and Abstrackr (free) [http://abstrackr.cebm.brown.edu/] systematic review screening tools. 4. Describe any quality-assurance procedures performed on the data: 5. People involved with sample collection, processing, analysis and/or submission: ———————————————————— DATA-SPECIFIC INFORMATION FOR: For Rayyan_Parth Rali SR results PERT.txt ———————————————————— 1. Number of databases searched: 4 databases, 2 grey literature sources 2. Number of citations: 1,648 (after deduped via Endnote X.7) File attached doesn’t include 89 references from MedRxiv that couldn’t be exported at the time of the search, total should be 1,737 if they were included. 3. Specialized formats or other abbreviations used: File is compatible to import to Rayyan, other systematic review and citation manager tools [a]@stephanie.roth@temple.edu Should we use this as the title of the dataset, or the title listed at the beginning of the Readme? [b]This is better since the other title makes it appear to be a full systematic review. [c]Could you summarize the methods you used in the data collection? [d]I added our search methods statement. [e]Could you add some information about Rayyan or other software? [f]Done